Donald Trump’s Plan to Eliminate the Education Department: What It Means for Students and Schools
Introduction
Former President Donald Trump’s has once again reiterated his desire to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, a move that would significantly alter the landscape of American education. His newly appointed Education Secretary, Linda McMahon, has been tasked with “putting herself out of a job,” signaling the administration’s commitment to shutting down the department and shifting its responsibilities to individual states.
But what exactly does the Education Department do, and what would its elimination mean for students, teachers, and institutions? This blog explores the potential consequences of Donald Trump’s plan, including its impact on student loans, civil rights protections, and federal funding for schools and colleges.
Donald Trump’s: What Does the U.S. Department of Education Do?
The Department of Education, established in 1979, plays a critical role in the U.S. education system. Its primary responsibilities include:
Managing federal student loans and financial aid – Overseeing approximately $1.5 trillion in student loan debt for more than 40 million borrowers.
Distributing federal education funding – Allocating billions of dollars annually to schools and universities.
Enforcing civil rights laws – Investigating discrimination cases and ensuring equal educational opportunities for marginalized groups.
Conducting research and data collection – Providing valuable insights into academic performance and policy effectiveness.
While federal funding comprises only 14% of public school budgets, it is a major source of funding for colleges and universities, particularly through research grants and financial aid programs.
If Donald Trump’s follows through with his plan, these responsibilities would need to be transferred to other agencies or state governments, a complex and legally challenging process.
Donald Trump’s Vision: What Would Change?
1. Student Loans and Financial Aid
One of the Education Department’s most significant roles is managing federal student loans and grants, including the Pell Grant and the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) system.
The Biden administration prioritized student debt relief, canceling over $175 billion in loans for nearly 4.8 million borrowers despite resistance from Republican-led states and a Supreme Court ruling against broader cancellation efforts.
Donald Trump, however, has criticized these initiatives, calling them “illegal” and “unfair” to taxpayers. While he has not presented a detailed alternative, his administration previously attempted to scale back loan forgiveness programs. If the Education Department is dismantled, it is unclear how student loan servicing would be handled or whether federal aid programs would be reduced or eliminated altogether.
Potential Impact:
Fewer protections and relief options for student borrowers.
Possible transfer of federal loan servicing to private companies.
Uncertainty surrounding grants and financial aid for low-income students.
2. Federal Funding for Schools and Colleges
Federal education funding helps support schools that serve low-income students, students with disabilities, and homeless children. Additionally, federal grants play a key role in higher education, funding research and scholarships.
Donald Trump’s has promised to cut federal funding to schools that incorporate topics he opposes, such as:
Critical race theory
LGBTQ+ rights and gender identity discussions
Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives
On the other hand, he has pledged to increase funding for states and schools that embrace universal school choice, a policy that promotes vouchers and charter schools over traditional public education.
Potential Impact:
Reduced funding for public schools, particularly in disadvantaged areas.
Financial incentives for schools that align with Trump’s conservative education policies.
Increased emphasis on private and charter schools over public education.
3. Civil Rights Enforcement in Education
The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for investigating discrimination complaints and ensuring compliance with Title IX, which protects students from discrimination based on sex, race, and disability.
Under Donald Trump’s, the department has already shifted its focus by:
Prioritizing antisemitism complaints over other civil rights issues.
Investigating colleges and athletic leagues for allowing transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports.
Opposing race-conscious admissions policies in higher education.
Donald Trump’s has also pledged to remove transgender students from Title IX protections, reversing the Biden administration’s interpretation that protects students based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
Potential Impact:
- Fewer federal protections for LGBTQ+ students.
- Increased legal challenges for colleges enforcing diversity and inclusion policies.
- Potential for increased discrimination lawsuits in education settings.
4. Education Data and Research
The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) collects essential data on school performance, graduation rates, and educational disparities. However, Trump’s administration has already begun dismantling the agency, arguing that it promotes “woke” and “wasteful” spending.
If the Education Department is eliminated, data collection responsibilities may be reduced or decentralized, making it harder for researchers and policymakers to track student performance nationwide.
Potential Impact:
- Less oversight of educational equity and student outcomes.
- Difficulty in assessing the effectiveness of education policies.
- Increased reliance on state-level data, which may lack consistency.
Could Donald Trump’s Actually Eliminate the Education Department?
While Donald Trump’s rhetoric about shutting down the department is bold, actually dismantling it would be legally and politically challenging.
Legal and Congressional Hurdles
Congressional approval is required to eliminate a federal agency, making it unlikely without a Republican-controlled House and Senate.
Federal education laws, such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Title IX, and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), mandate federal oversight, making elimination difficult.
State and Institutional Pushback
Many Republican-led states rely on federal education funding, making them unlikely to fully support elimination.
Universities and research institutions depend on federal grants, increasing opposition from higher education leaders.
Even if the department were significantly weakened, its core functions would likely be transferred to other agencies rather than eliminated entirely.
Conclusion: What’s at Stake?
Donald Trump’s proposal to dismantle the Education Department represents a dramatic shift in federal education policy, prioritizing state control, school choice, and conservative education values over centralized federal oversight.
While his plan aligns with conservative views on limiting federal influence, critics argue it could weaken protections for marginalized students, reduce funding for public schools, and create uncertainty in student loan management.
Ultimately, the fate of the Education Department will depend on the outcome of future elections, Congressional control, and public support for Trump’s policies. For now, students, educators, and parents must closely monitor how these proposals evolve and what they could mean for the future of American education.
By
